Back to top anchor
Working paper

Geography and the Inclusive Economy: A Regional Perspective (WP 01/17)

Issue date: 
Saturday, 1 December 2001
Status: 
Current
View point: 
Document Date: 
Publication category: 
JEL classification: 
R10 - General Regional Economics (includes Regional Data)
Fiscal year: 
2001/02

Formats and related files

The paper discusses the extent to which differences in economic and social indicators across regions might constitute problems, illustrates the importance of understanding empirical patterns of deprivation in New Zealand and outlines some key policy directions.

Abstract

The paper expands on the regional geographic dimensions of the inclusive economy outlined in Treasury Working Paper 01/15 Towards an Inclusive Economy. It discusses the extent to which differences in economic and social indicators across regions might constitute problems, illustrates the importance of understanding empirical patterns of deprivation in New Zealand and outlines some key policy directions.

In some instances, differences in indicators of well-being between regions indicate positive dynamics, for example cities generate higher productivity and wages as well as consumption benefits. In other instances, regional differences may be problematic, for example when spillovers perpetuate social problems or people may become stuck in declining areas.

Auckland is important – it contains 36% of all deprived neighbourhoods in New Zealand, and the proportion is growing over time. Rural deprived regions, particularly Northland and Gisborne with 24% of their population living in deprived neighbourhoods, also warrant attention if people are stuck and/or community functioning is impaired. There is a high preponderance of Maori and Pacific peoples in both urban and rural deprived neighbourhoods.

Avenues for policy exploration include education, enhancing connectedness, and ensuring that people are free to move to job-rich areas. Intervention in local economies needs to be selective and evaluation of all policy intervention is important. Policies that are spatially neutral may have unintended spatial effects and this also requires further attention.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Sarah Box, Hauraki Greenland, Lesley Haines, Benedikte Jensen, Geoff Lewis, Dave Mare, Peter Mawson, Murray Petrie, Roger Procter and Jason Timmins for their input into this paper.

Last updated: 
Tuesday, 23 October 2007